Leadership and organization development
Code:
HSM245Name:
Leadership and organization developmentTeaching semester:
AutumnLocations:
OsloYear:
2025 — 2026Teaching language:
EnglishStudy points:
10 Credits
The following mandatory learning activities must be approved before students can present themselves for final assessment:
- Group assignment, max. 3 students per group: Analysis of a set problem associated with organisation development, max. 1500 words (except bibliography).
- 80% attendance in class.
Should a group fail their assignment, they will be given a second opportunity, in the same academic term, to hand in an improved answer for assessment.
Project group examination based on a set case. Max. 3 students per group.
Scope of assignment is 7000 words (+/- 15%) and 4 weeks deadline. The bibliography is not included in the number of words.
Higher Education Entrance Qualification.
For exchange students from NLA’s partner institutions: The students must be studying business administration or a related field of study.
- Definitions of OD
- Basic assumptions and values associated with OD
- Leadership of OD processes with special emphasis on the action research model for planning, implementing and evaluating the OD process
- The operational components in processes of change
- Diagnostic methodologies for organizations
- Intervention techniques to achieve change/improvement through value-adding processes
- Contributors to the OD process and their roles within the process
- External consultants as designers of OD processes
- Barriers and critical success factors in OD processes
- Measurement and evaluation of OD processes
- Power and politics in OD processes
- The importance of organizational learning in OD processes
- Barriers to organizational learning
- Establishing a learning organization
- The dark side of leadership: consequences for OD
On completion of the course, students will have acquired the following learning outcomes:
Knowledge
Students
- have broad knowledge within the concepts of diagnosis and intervention, and can give an account of the relationship between the two concepts
- have broad knowledge within the action research model as a way of driving OD processes forward
- have knowledge about how to evaluate the results of OD processes
- have broad knowledge within relationship between OD and learning in organisations, including learning processes that block/promote OD
- have a broad understanding on the interaction between a consultant and client, and explains how to achieve a healthy helping relationship
- have broad knowledge within special OD challenges that have been identified in recent research, e.g., "interpersonal mistreatment"
- have knowledge on how to plan, communicate and lead OU processes in different types of organisations (businesses, voluntary and not-for-profit organisations.)
- have knowledge on the significance of Hauge’s contribution to develop the Norwegian society
Skills
Students
- can provide valuable advice in OD processes and assist with the planning, implementation, and evaluation of such processes
- can identify factors that either block or promote OD processes
- can promote motivation and team spirit in OD processes
- can diagnose internal organisational processes with a view to identifying strengths and weaknesses
- can facilitate the use of intervention techniques to improve internal organisational processes
- can identify resistance to change and provide advice on how to handle this type of barrier
- can evaluate the effectiveness of implemented organisational interventions
General competence
Students
- can analyse problems associated with the relationship between leadership and OD in a critical, reflective manner
- can identify and assess ethical issues in OD processes
- can present analyses associated with OD in an academic written presentation
- can give an account of the key actors in OD processes and of their roles in the process
Organization Development & Change (Edition:2)
Cummings, Thomas, Cengage Learning EMEA, 2022, isbn:9781473796461,
The attached PDF file contains an overview of the older version, covering 22 chapters, with permission from the publisher. I still highly recommend (manadatory!) getting the latest version (2025 version). Mohammad.zarei@nla.no
ArticleVisualizing the landscape and evolution of leadership research
Zhu, Jinlong; Song, Lynda Jiwen; Zhu, Li; Johnson, Russell E, [Greenwich, Conn.] :, JAI Press, The leadership quarterly, 2, 30, 2019-04; 1990, 215-232,
This bibliometric analysis, by reviewing 6,528 leadership works spanning the period from 1990 to 2017, helps us to get to the bottom of the leadership field and know the most influential/contemporaray leadership styles that practically can impact organizational development interventions.
View online
Article
The dark side of leadership: A systematic review of creativity and innovation
Mehraein, Vahid; Visintin, Francesca; Pittino, Daniel, [Oxford] :, Blackwell Publishers,, International journal of management reviews., 4, 25, 2023-10; 1999-, 740-767,
Leadership plays major roles in OD, especially human process interventions. This systematic review examines what happens when leadership goes wrong—the dark side of leadership—and how it can negatively impact individual and organizational levels outcomes, such as creativity and innovation. It ultimately offers recommendations for improvement.
View online
Article
Matching leadership styles with employment modes: strategic human resource management perspective
Liu, Wei; Lepak, David P; Takeuchi, Riki; Sims, Henry P, [New York, N.Y.] :, Elsevier, Human resource management review., 1, 13, 2003-1; 1991, 127-152,
If the OD diagnosis shows leadership malfunctions, or analysis recommends a new development of leadership, the question is how to decide on which leadership style to choose? To address similar issues, this article provides relevant recommendations, including guidance on how to know which styles fit and how to best approach it to mach with employment modes.
View online
Project examinations are graded from A to F with A being the top grade and F being Fail. Group grading.
In working with a group exam, all participants in the group must contribute to the common product. If there is any doubt as to whether a student contributes or has contributed sufficiently to gain credit for a joint product, the routine described in the study plan will be implemented.
